Effectiveness of neurolysis as a treatment for complications of leprosy neuritis: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Complications of leprosy neuritis are considered serious and apparent, with the potential to disable and/or limit individuals. These complications affect not only a patient's physical functioning, but also their family and social lives, while directly impacting the ability to work and/or maintain financial independence, subsequently interfering with their overall quality of life. The present review, therefore, aimed to analyze the effectiveness of neurolysis as an alternative treatment for the complications associated with leprosy neuritis. METHODS: The present review was performed based on the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, in an effort to answer the following research question: what is the effectiveness of neurolysis as a treatment for leprosy neuritis complications? This research question was defined using the patient-intervention-outcome (PIO) framework, where leprosy represents 'P', neurolysis for 'I', and neuropathic pain/motor function/sensorial function/physical disability/quality of life for 'O'. Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials and prospective observational cohort studies were included in the present review, with no time or date restrictions. RESULTS: The present review included 1 randomized clinical trial and 10 prospective studies, published between 1976 and 2020. All of the outcomes showed improvement, with relief from neuropathic pain being the primary finding. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence obtained in the present review suggested that neurolysis is an effective alternative for the treatment of physical disabilities, the recovery of sensory and motor function, the restoration of quality of life, and neuropathic pain relief.

Thalidomide alleviates neuropathic pain through microglial IL-10/ß-endorphin signaling pathway.

Thalidomide is an antiinflammatory, antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory agent which has been used for the treatment of erythema nodosum leprosum and multiple myeloma. It has also been employed in treating complex regional pain syndromes. The current study aimed to reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying thalidomide-induced pain antihypersensitive effects in neuropathic pain. Thalidomide gavage, but not its more potent analogs lenalidomide and pomalidomide, inhibited mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia in neuropathic pain rats induced by tight ligation of spinal nerves, with ED50 values of 44.9 and 23.5 mg/kg, and Emax values of 74% and 84% MPE respectively. Intrathecal injection of thalidomide also inhibited mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia in neuropathic pain. Treatment with thalidomide, lenalidomide and pomalidomide reduced peripheral nerve injury-induced proinflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL-1ß and IL-6) in the ipsilateral spinal cords of neuropathic rats and LPS-treated primary microglial cells. In contrast, treatment with thalidomide, but not lenalidomide or pomalidomide, stimulated spinal expressions of IL-10 and ß-endorphin in neuropathic rats. Particularly, thalidomide specifically stimulated IL-10 and ß-endorphin expressions in microglia but not astrocytes or neurons. Furthermore, pretreatment with the IL-10 antibody blocked upregulation of ß-endorphin in neuropathic rats and cultured microglial cells, whereas it did not restore thalidomide-induced downregulation of proinflammatory cytokine expression. Importantly, pretreatment with intrathecal injection of the microglial metabolic inhibitor minocycline, IL-10 antibody, ß-endorphin antiserum, and preferred or selective µ-opioid receptor antagonist naloxone or CTAP entirely blocked thalidomide gavage-induced mechanical antiallodynia. Our results demonstrate that thalidomide, but not lenalidomide or pomalidomide, alleviates neuropathic pain, which is mediated by upregulation of spinal microglial IL-10/ß-endorphin expression, rather than downregulation of TNFα expression.

Botulinum toxin type A in chronic neuropathic pain in refractory leprosy.

OBJECTIVE: Neuropathic pain is a chronic syndrome that is difficult to treat and often affects patients with leprosy. Recommended treatment includes the the use of analgesic drugs, codeine, tricyclic antidepressants, neuroleptics, anticonvulsants and thalidomide, but without consensus on uniform dose and fully satisfactory results. To analyze botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) effectiveness in treatment of chronic neuropathic pain in refractory leprous patients, as well as evaluate and compare the quality of life of patients before and after using the medication. METHODS: We used a specific protocol including clinical, demographic, DN4 protocol, analogue scale (VAS), sensory evaluation and evaluation of the WHOQOL-BREF. Therapeutic intervention was performed with BOTOX® BTX-A 100U administered subcutaneously. Fifteen patients were evaluated on days 0, 10 and 60. RESULTS: Patients on VAS showed pain between 5 and 10, in one case there was complete pain relief in 60 days, while others showed improvement in the first week with the return of symptoms with less intensity after this period. WHOQOL-BREF's domains Quality of Life and Physical to have a significant increase in QOL. CONCLUSION: BoNT-A proved to be a good therapeutic option in relieving pain with improved quality of life for these patients.

Botulinum toxin type A in chronic neuropathic pain in refractory leprosy / Toxina Botulínica Tipo A em Dor Neuropática Crônica em Hanseníase

ABSTRACT Neuropathic pain is a chronic syndrome that is difficult to treat and often affects patients with leprosy. Recommended treatment includes the the use of analgesic drugs, codeine, tricyclic antidepressants, neuroleptics, anticonvulsants and thalidomide, but without consensus on uniform dose and fully satisfactory results. Objective: To analyze botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) effectiveness in treatment of chronic neuropathic pain in refractory leprous patients, as well as evaluate and compare the quality of life of patients before and after using the medication. Methods: We used a specific protocol including clinical, demographic, DN4 protocol, analogue scale (VAS), sensory evaluation and evaluation of the WHOQOL-BREF. Therapeutic intervention was performed with BOTOX® BTX-A 100U administered subcutaneously. Fifteen patients were evaluated on days 0, 10 and 60. Results: Patients on VAS showed pain between 5 and 10, in one case there was complete pain relief in 60 days, while others showed improvement in the first week with the return of symptoms with less intensity after this period. WHOQOL-BREF's domains Quality of Life and Physical to have a significant increase in QOL. Conclusion: BoNT-A proved to be a good therapeutic option in relieving pain with improved quality of life for these patients.

RESUMO A dor neuropática é uma síndrome crônica que é difícil de tratar e freqüentemente afeta pacientes com hanseníase. O tratamento recomendado inclui o uso de drogas analgésicas, codeína, antidepressivos tricíclicos, neurolépticos, anticonvulsivantes e talidomida, mas sem consenso sobre dose uniforme e resultados plenamente satisfatórios. Objetivo: Busca-se analisar a efetividade da toxina botulínica tipo A no tratamento da dor neuropática crônica hansênica refratária. Método: Estudo de intervenção do tipo ensaio clínico em portadores de dor neuropática crônica hansênica. Foram coletados dados epidemiológicos, protocolo DN4, escala analógica da dor (EVA), avaliação sensitiva, motora a avaliação do WHOQOL-Bref. Realizado intervenção terapêutica com toxina botulínica tipo A 100U. Os pacientes foram avaliados nos dias de 0, 10 e 60. A dor neuropática foi mais frequente no sexo masculino, na faixa etária de 40 à 49 anos. Resultados: Da forma Dimorfa, multibacilar com baciloscopia positiva e incapacidades presentes. Os escores EVA variam entre 5 e 10, todos os pacientes apresentaram alterações sensoriais. O WHOQOL-Bref apresentou melhora após o tratamento com TxBA. A TxBA foi bem tolerada o único efeito adverso notável foi dor leve. E com apenas uma única aplicação de TxBA promoveu efeitos analgésicos a longo prazo em pacientes com dor associada à alodinia, sugerindo que a analgesia observada pode ser causada por um efeito periférico da TxBA em terminações nociceptivas. Conclusão: O estudo sugere que a TxBA é uma boa opção para os casos de dor neuropática crônica hansênica, no entanto, novos estudos são necessários para confirmar estes resultados.

Neuropathic pain in leprosy: symptom profile characterization and comparison with neuropathic pain of other etiologies

Introduction: Previous studies reported a high prevalence of neuropathic pain in leprosy, being especially present in "pharmacologically cured" patients. The presence of neuropathic pain in leprosy poses a supplementary burden in patient's quality of life, daily activities, and mood.Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess whether neuropathic pain in leprosy has similar symptom profile as neuropathic pain of other etiologies and to retrospectively assess the efficacy of neuropathic pain medications regularly prescribed to leprosy. Methods: Leprosy and nonleprosy patients had their neuropathic pain characterized by the neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI, ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 being the maximal neuropathic pain intensity) in a first visit. In a second visit, leprosy patients who had significant pain and received pharmacological treatment in the first evaluation were reassessed (NPSI) and had their pain profile and treatment response further characterized, including information on drugs prescribed for neuropathic pain and their respective pain relief. Results: The pain characteristics based on NPSI did not significantly differ between leprosy and nonleprosy neuropathic pain patients in visit 1 after correction for multiple analyses, and cluster analyses confirmed these findings (ie, no discrimination between leprosy and nonleprosy groups; Pearson x2 5 0.072, P 5 0.788). The assessment of pain relief response and the drugs taken by each patient, linear regression analysis showed that amitriptyline, when effective, had the highest percentage of analgesic relief. Conclusions: Neuropathic pain in leprosy is as heterogeneous as neuropathic pain of other etiologies, further supporting the concept that neuropathic pain is a transetiological entity. Neuropathic pain in leprosy may respond to drugs usually used to control pain of neuropathic profile in general, and amitriptiline may constitute a potential candidate drug for future formal clinical trials aimed at controlling neuropathic pain in leprosy.

Avaliação da S(+)-cetamina no tratamento da dor neuropática e qualidade de vida em portadores de hanseníase / Assessment of the S (+) ketamine in the treatment of neuropathic pain and quality of life in patients with leprosy

A dor neuropática é uma síndrome dolorosa crônica, que ocorre muito frequentemente em pacientes com hanseníase, de difícil tratamento. Objetivou-se avaliar o efeito terapêutico da S(+)-cetamina na dor neuropática e qualidade de vida em portadores de hanseníase atendidos em ambulatórios em São Luís - MA. Estudo experimental tipo ensaio clínico, prospectivo, aleatório, duplamente cego, controlado por placebo, com 34 pacientes distribuídos aleatoriamente em um dois grupos, cetamina e placebo por três meses e randomizados por numeração sequenciada. A dor foi avaliada por meio de escala analógica visual (EAV) nas seis visitas quinzenais (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 e 6), e pelo inventário DN4, na visita 1 e 6, com distribuição da S(+)-cetamina e o analgésico de resgate e avaliado os efeitos adversos em cada visita. Realizou-se a coleta de 15mL de sangue para exames de segurança na visita 1 e 6 e para quantificação de citocinas plasmáticas IL-1, IL-6 e TNFα, nas visitas 1, 2, 4 e 6. Foi também, avaliada a qualidade de vida por meio do questionário WHOQOL-Bref nas visitas 1 e 6. Os resultados demostraram predominância do sexo feminino, idade de 18 a 29 anos, pardos, solteiros, renda de 2 a 4 salários mínimos; e média de 7,78±2,21 anos de estudo. Na avaliação da dor pela EAV os dois grupos apresentaram uma redução dos escores médios de dor ao longo do tempo, e mostrou significância estatística p < 0,05. Entretanto não foi observada diferença estatística para os escores de dor entre os grupos e também, em relação ao uso do medicamento analgésico (codeína) de resgate. Houve redução significante nos escore de DN4 no grupo placebo em relação às avaliações iniciais e finais comparadas à cetamina, ainda os escores iniciais do DN4 foram significativamente menores no grupo placebo, nas avaliações de antes e depois do uso da S(+)-cetamina. Na avaliação da qualidade de vida nos domínios físico, psicológico, relações sociais e meio ambiente, não se observou diferença estatisticamente ...

Neuropathic pain is a chronic pain syndrome of difficult treatment, occurring frequently in patients with leprosy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of S(+)-ketamine on neuropathic pain and quality of life in patients with leprosy seen at an outpatient clinic in São Luís - Ma. Experimental study clinical trial, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 34 patients in a randomized two groups, ketamine and placebo for three months and randomized by sequential numbering. Pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) on six bimonthly visits (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6), and using the DN4 questionnaire on visits 1 and 6, with distribution of S (+)-ketamine and rescue analgesic and adverse effects assessed at each visit. Blood (15ml) was drawn from patients for safety tests on visits 1 and 6, and on visits 1, 2, 4 and 6, to cytokines IL-1, IL-6 and TNFα. Quality of life was also evaluated using WHOQOL-Bref on visits 1 and 6. Results showed most subjects female, age 18 and 29 years of age, pardo ethnicity, single, income between 2 and 4 minimum salaries, and a mean 7.78±2.21 years of education. In the assessment of pain by VAS both groups showed a reduction in mean pain scores over time, and showed statistical significance p <0.05. However there was no statistical difference in pain scores between groups and also in relation to the use of analgesic medication (codeine). There was significant reduction in DN4 score in the placebo group compared to the initial and final evaluations compared to ketamine, although the initial DN4 scores were significantly lower in the placebo group, the assessments before and after the use of S (+)-ketamine. In evaluating the quality of life in the physical, psychological, social relationships and environment, there was no statistically significant difference between groups. The amounts of IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α in serum of four collections of ketamine and placebo ...

Prevalence and characteristics of neuropathic pain in the people affected by leprosy in China.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and the characteristics of neuropathic pain among the people affected by leprosy in China. METHODS: People affected by leprosy in four leprosy villages were interviewed about neuropathic pain with an interviewer-administrated questionnaire. RESULTS: In a total of 275 patients with leprosy interviewed, 126 (45.8%) reported having symptoms suggestive of neuropathic pain. The pain was severe in 70 (55.5%) patients, moderate in 49 (38.9%) and mild in 7 (5.6%). Of the 126 patients with leprosy, 109 (86.5%) stated that the pain had some impact on their daily life: mild in 13 (10.3%), moderate in 45 (35.7%) and severe in 51 (40.5%). Sleep disturbance caused by pain was reported in 119 (94.4%) patients with leprosy: mild in 13 (10.3%), moderate in 51 (40.5%) and severe in 55 (43.6%). Ninety-six patients with leprosy (76.2%) reported that they had tried analgesics alone or in combination with steroids for the relief of their pain, of which 78 (81.2%) people reported that the treatment was effective. CONCLUSIONS: Neuropathic pain is not uncommon in both MB and PB patients who have completed effective antimicrobial treatment. The effectiveness of analgesics alone or in combination with steroids, in the treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with leprosy, needs to be studied.

[Tendencies of prescriptions for neuralgic pain in National Suruga Sanatorium (leprosy), Japan during last 11 years].

The number of ex-leprosy patients has reduced rapidly who were forced to be admitted under leprosy prevention/segregation law and are staying at national sanatoriums with different disabilities due to different physical and social reasons for long time in Japan. Most of them have been of clinically cured status for decades after effective chemotherapy. Some have still been suffering from acute or chronic neuralgic pains which are supposed to be long standing consequences of nerve damage of leprosy and getting medications for long period. Pharmacy department of National Suruga Sanatorium has studied the amount of prescriptions of some medicines for last 11 years, which were thought to be prescribed for pain including neuralgic pain. There seem to be some tendencies of medications during last decade. VitaminB12 (Mecobalamine) is one of the commonest drugs for neuralgic pain at this sanatorium and the amount of prescription had almost been unchanged through the years. Prescription of non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) increased year by year, which may reflect the increasing age of ex-patients who need more pain killers for their painful joints or back. Loxoprofen is the most popular pain killer here and increased by ten times for last decade. The number of prescription for Pentazocine and Hydroxyzine Hydrochloride injection increased for last several years, which reflects a few patients who were still suffering from severe chronic neuralgia for years. It is desirable that a standard regimen for chronic neuralgic pain as a consequence of nerve impairment in leprosy will be developed as soon as possible.

[Mechanisms of the development of neuropathic pain and its treatment].

Neuropathic pain has been known to be refractory to traditional analgesics, such as opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatoy drugs. Some mechanisms of the development of neuropathic pain have been proposed; 1) sprouting of A beta fibers to the superficial layer of the dorsal horn, 2) ectopic discharge in the dorsal root ganglion and/or in neuroma at the nerve stump, 3) spinal sensitization. Ectopic discharge has been reported to be inhibited by Na+ channel blocker, such as lidocaine, and anticonvulsant. Lidocaine and anticonvulsant are used in the management of neuropathic pain. Activation of NMDA receptor is usually involved in the development of spinal sensitization and NMDA receptor antagonist, such as ketamine, is used in the management of neuropathic pain. Recently, alpha2delta subunit blocker, new class of anticonvulsant, is introduced to the management of neuropathic pain. alpha2delta subunit is the subunit of Ca2+ channel and modulate the influx of Ca2+. This Ca2+ influx induces release of neurotransmitter in the neuron. alpha 2 delta subunit blockers, such as gabapentin and pregabalin, may reduce the release of neurotransmitter and elicit analgesic effect in the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Neuropathic pain in leprosy.

Chronic neuropathic pain in treated leprosy has received scant attention. In this article the concept, clinical features and diagnosis of neuropathic pain are reviewed. The possible pathophysiological mechanisms, treatment challenges and research needs in this area are discussed.

[Pentoxifylline in the treatment of erythema nodosum leprosum: results of an open study]. / Efficacité de la pentoxifylline dans le traitement de l'érythème noueux lépreux: résultats d'une étude ouverte.

Erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL) is a well-known immunological serious complication affecting lepromatous multibacillary leprosy patients. For a long time, ENL has been regarded as an immune complex-mediated disease or Arthus phenomenon. Recently, it has been reported that ENL was associated with high serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFa) levels, suggesting that this cytokine could also play a central role in the manifestations of ENL. Thalidomide (TH) and systemic steroids (S), both TNFa production inhibitors, are the two current effective drugs for the management of ENL. However, TH is rarely available in leprosy endemic countries, and its teratogenicity and neurotoxicity strongly limit its use. Moreover, the morbidity of S and the frequent steroid-dependence of ENL also create real therapeutic problems. Recently, the efficacy of pentoxifylline (PTX), which also inhibits in vitro and in vivo production of TNFa, has been suggested for ENL treatment. We report our experience on its use for the treatment of 15 leprosy patients suffering from a first ENL. attack. (11 cases), a chronic steroid-dependent ENL (3 cases) or chronic steroid- and thalidomide-dependent ENL (1 case). PTX has been given at 800 mg t.i.d, (2 cases) or 400 mg t.i.d. (13 cases) doses. The patients received PTX at the initiating dosage until complete clinical cure. At the end of ENL attacks, PTX was either abruptly stopped or tapered down over the next 4 months. In ten of 11 patients who developed ENL for the first time, the systemic symptoms and neuritic pains disappeared within one week; at three weeks, half of the patients were cured and the other half had striking clinical improvement; complete cure was obtained within 7 to 35 days (mean: 27 days). A relapse occurred within 2-3 months in the 5 patients, in which PTX was abruptly stopped. In contrast, no relapse occurred in the patients who benefited from decreasing doses of PTX. Recurrent ENL episodes also responded well to PTX. The 3 patients who had chronic steroid-dependent ENL failed to show any improvement after 3 to 6 weeks of PTX. In contrast, steroid therapy could be stopped in the steroid- and thalidomide-dependent patient. Our results confirm the action of PTX if it is slowly tapered down (4 months seem sufficient) and not abruptly to avoid relapses. As it is safe use, PTX could constitute the first line of ENL attack treatment.

A talidomida no contrôle da dor nas neurites lepróticas / Thalidomide in the control of pain in leprotic neuritis

The authors report the effect of thalidomide in controlling neuralgic manifestations of leprosy in 27 patients. The drug was given orally at the dosage of 100mg twice a day for 5 days, 100mg daily for a weeek and 100 mg each 48 hours in the subsequent days . Only in 3 cases there were mild side effects. Pain was reduced and the authors relate that 16 cases were considered excellent, 9 cases good and 2 cases fair. They conclude that the drug is efficient in the control of pain in leprotic neuritis.